Wednesday, June 29, 2005

The Finest Handmade Corks

Storytime at Dotcomicide.

About 150 years ago, just about anything liquid that was worth saving in a bottle was stoppered with a cork. This of course, lead to the existence of a few very powerful cork distributorships.

The easiest way to sort the corks was to dump them all into a nearby lake, at one point their were about 8 billion of them, bobbing this way and that, just waiting to be plugged into a bottle. Demand was so great that none of the cork distributors could actually inspect all the individual corks, they'd just scoop them up by the thousands and show them to their customers.

The problem was that they received cork of varying quality, some were finely crafted corks lovingly made by hand in Podunk, Iowa, and some were shoddy, "Made in Spamistan" corks that didn't hold up to close scrutiny.

So the distributors developed an elaborate quality control system, a cork sorting machine, so they'd scoop as many corks as they could, and let them roll down massive clockwork conveyor belts where they'd be guided through a series of scales, measuring tubes and proddy things that attempted to make sure that the ones that didn't meet their quality standards were not shown to their clients.

Every once in a while, a Spamistanian cork would elude the automated inspection process and get put on the display shelves, and sometimes a Podunkian cork would get crushed in the mass of gears and pulleys of their clockwork inspection system, never to be seen again.

"Sorry, we didn't mean to crush your little cork", the cork distributors would say. Sometimes they'd say "As far as we can tell, your little cork is in the lake somewhere, it's just not on display where most clients can see it." Then the Podunkian craftsmen would have to wait til the cork dealers stirred their watery inventory again and see if their little cork would pop up out of the murky depths once again.

The fine cork craftsmen would seethe and rant about how unfair the inspection system was. The Spamistanians would smirk, because they knew that as long as cork stoppers were in high demand, the inspection process would be automated and they could keep churning out shoddy corks, because enough would slip past the inspection system to make it worth their time.

Just got back from the Webmasterworld Pubcon in New Orleans a couple days ago, and there's a lot of news to tell.

Met several engineers from Google. Cool guys (and gal). Met several engineers from MSN Search. Cool guys (and gal). Met two engineers from Yahoo. Cool guys. Met the director of promotions for Ask Jeeves. Cool guy.

What do all the SEs have in common? Well they have normal everyday computer geeks all working hard to make the same product - quality search results. There was no evidence of an evil cabal that is trying to destroy the affiliate model, there was no evidence of the SEs targeting specific niches to boost their advertising revenues (Well, maybe Ask Jeeves, a little).

The search engine engineers all really seemed to have the same goal - they want to produce the best search results that they can. (Except for Jeeves - we all know they're just a bunch of money grubbers).

The problem is the lone webmaster sitting at his desk in Podunk, Iowa takes it all too personally. When a search engine nukes his rankings, the issue suddenly is that they're after the little guy. Earth to Podunk - None of the search engines know you who you are - as in the singular, not collective "you", no, they have no idea.

They don't see the "handcrafted by Bob" branded on the side of your little cork - they just see 8 metric tons automatically sorted cork waiting to be parceled out to eager customers. They certainly will be sympathetic, if you happen to corner them at a party, but relax, they're not out to get you.

If you are having trouble ranking a site, just try to think like a search engineer might, and think of the cork sorting machine, that prodded and tested all those corks. What should your page tell a search engine that will make it appear to be a quality page? What signals could the search engines use that would easily and automatically detect sites that are they type of quality that their customers, the searchers, want?

We all strive to be Podunkians, perhaps, or maybe some prefer the Spamistanian model, but in the long run, we all have to take our licks from time to time, no matter which method we use - but trust me, it's nothing personal.

Tuesday, June 07, 2005

Outsourcing Web Designers

Are people tired of outsourcing? While checking the logs for one of my new sites, a directory of web designers - I was amused see this entry:
web designer -india anywhere

In general, you can certainly get a website done cheap by getting it from India or what have you, but there is a definite disadvantage when you divorce the optimization from the planning of a website.

From what I've seen the bulk of the outsourcing companies are designing visually - and then optimizers are left to pick through the mess and try to make it rank.

I don't doubt there are some top notch India SEO/Design firms - but on the other hand they're not charging $100 for a website either.

One of my acquaintances bought a website design from one company for $300 or $400 dollars, only to later discover it was a $15 "monster template" that they plugged his info into. Another business owner told me that they paid a much higher price to design a custom template only to discover that the company was peddling it to other clients afterwards.

As with anything, bad news travels faster than good - but if you use an outsourcing company, be sure to carefully check their references, and make sure that you are not getting taken advantage of. Otherwise, you'll need to restrict your searches like this guy did "web designer -india anywhere".

Monday, June 06, 2005

Search Engine Watch Forum Isn't Search Engine Friendly?

SearchEngineWatch.com is arguably one of the foremost sites in the biz - so why are their forums so bad?

I am not talking about their members, or the content - but the forum's design leaves a whole lot to be desired.

1) Hard to Navigate - too much clutter - and the navigation is not intuitive.

2) Not search engine friendly: SEW's forum URLs are a tangle of parameters that could be easily rewritten.

In fact using this many parameters in a URL probably explains why Google has most of the 46,000 URLs it knows about showing as URL only.

Maybe Jupiter doesn't feel that they need SE traffic - they have enough traffic from their newsletter subscribers and other web properties to keep the SEW forums busy 24 hours a day, however, I just can't believe that one of the industry's leading resources would make such a poorly optimized forum - especially when a relatively uncomplicated htaccess could rewrite the parameters as static URLs.

Sunday, June 05, 2005

Google Bourbon IV - Authority Knob On 11

As Bourbon heads towards its final hours, some interesting side effects are surfacing.

Right now, Google seems to have the authority knob turned to 11. A good example is a google search for "adsense".

If you notice, Slashdot is currently ranking #4 for adsense, in fact, the article that is ranking is the discussion of the recent AdSense URL hijacking.



There are several other examples of this - authority sites like the New York Times ranking for terms that an article covers.

It remains to see if adjusting the weight of authority sites is going to be part of the "tweaking", or if it is going to stick.

Related posts:
Ask Googleguy About Update Bourbon
Google Bourbon III
Google Bourbon II
Google Bourbon I
Google's Bourbon Hangover

Thursday, June 02, 2005

Ask Googleguy About Update Bourbon

Webmasterworld is currently hosting a Questions for Googleguy thread, as well as a Googleguy only thread where he answers select questions that were brought up in the lengthy Google Bourbon update threads at WW.

Highlights so far include:

  • Googleguy reminds people again that Bourbon is only "halfway through".


  • He suggests that Googlebot pretty much ignores any page with "&id=" in its URL - this is done to avoid indexing duplicates of pages with different session ID strings.


  • Google's PageRank ™ is continuously updated by dedicated machines, the toolbar PR is only a "snapshot in time" (didn't we all know that already?).


  • That webmasters should use absolute links instead of relative links on their pages, and that it is highly recommended that sites use a 301 redirect to send non-WWW requests to the WWW (or vice versa - pick one and stick with it). Furthermore he recommends that webmasters chose a single home page convention and use it consistently through the site (all links to the home page should be www.dotcomicide.com, not www.dotcomicide.com/index.html, and other variations.


  • He stresses the importance of natural, organic growth of a site's links, and suggests that a site that has a "viral" growth spurt won't be harmed by a sudden influx of links (but won't be helped either) - citing as an example, a "friendster" type site that has surged in popularity, gaining massive links in recent months.


  • Googleguy suggests that webmasters submitting a "reinclusion request" for a site send in detail a complete description of what the site was doing wrong, and expect at least 4-6 weeks for the request to be processed.


All in all, some great answers from Googleguy - with more to come.

Related posts:
Google Bourbon III
Google Bourbon II
Google Bourbon I
Google's Bourbon Hangover

Wednesday, June 01, 2005

Google Bourbon III - GoogleGuy Speaks

According to this post (msg 422) by GoogleGuy on the Webmaster World forum, the Bourbon update was set to implement "3.5 improvements in search quality", some of which have yet to be implemented.

He also goes on to say that the ".5" change is slated to go into effect today, with another major change planned for later this week, after which the usual tweaking / adjustments will take place.

This is definitely one of the slowest rollouts I've seen in a long time, so I think that they are being very careful not to throw out the baby with the bathwater like they did with the Florida Update.

More tears yet to come, I'm afraid.

Related posts:
Google Bourbon II
Google Bourbon I
Google's Bourbon Hangover